ABA vs Ohio Tools
ABA currently leads with 6,342 concurrent players against 1,706, a 3.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 7,645 concurrent players, versus 4,783. Momentum favours ABA: -0.5% week over week versus -17.5% for Ohio Tools. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 24.1M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and Ohio Tools is charted above.
ABA
6,342
playing now
7,645 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Ohio Tools
1,706
playing now
3,213 24h peak · 24.1M visits
Player count history
ABAOhio Tools
Head to head
| Metric | ABA | Ohio Tools | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 6,342 | 1,706 | 4,636 (3.7×) |
| 24h peak | 7,645 | 3,213 | 4,432 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 6,510 | 2,220 | 4,290 (2.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,645 | 3,973 | 3,672 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 5,490 | 2,570 | 2,920 (2.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,645 | 3,973 | 3,672 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 7,645 | 4,783 | 2,862 (1.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 12.4% | ▼ 9.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 0.5% | ▼ 17.5% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 24.1M | 1.3B (54.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 511.4K | 233.7K | 277.7K (2.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.4M | 1.8M | 1.6M (1.9×) |
| Favorites | 1M | 44.2K | 956.8K (22.6×) |
| Rating | 80.8% | 80.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #171 | #701 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 70.5 | -45.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2018 | Aug 30, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Action | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for ABA, 13 for Ohio Tools.