ABA vs Jump for Cases | RNG
ABA currently leads with 5,273 concurrent players against 1,567, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump for Cases | RNG at 8,801 concurrent players, versus 7,226. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 2.9M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and Jump for Cases | RNG is charted above.
ABA
5,273
playing now
7,226 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Jump for Cases | RNG
1,567
playing now
8,801 24h peak · 2.9M visits
Player count history
ABAJump for Cases | RNG
Head to head
| Metric | ABA | Jump for Cases | RNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,273 | 1,567 | 3,706 (3.4×) |
| 24h peak | 7,226 | 8,801 | 1,575 |
| 24h average | 5,440 | 2,051 | 3,389 (2.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,226 | 8,801 | 1,575 |
| 7-day average | 5,482 | 1,468 | 4,014 (3.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,226 | 8,801 | 1,575 |
| All-time peak | 7,226 | 8,801 | 1,575 |
| 24h change | ▲ 25.9% | ▲ 24.1% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 2.9M | 1.3B (445.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 455.4K | 202.9K | 252.4K (2.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.7M | 458.4K | 1.2M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 1M | 92.7K | 907.4K (10.8×) |
| Rating | 80.8% | 97.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #282 | #916 | of 4,425 |
| Trending score | -2.9 | 129.4 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2018 | May 14, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Action | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for ABA, 4 for Jump for Cases | RNG.