[2X] Basketball Legends vs [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step
[NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step currently leads with 8,865 concurrent players against 5,114, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step at 16,266 concurrent players, versus 8,518. Momentum favours [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step: +79.2% week over week versus -2.4% for [2X] Basketball Legends. Lifetime, [2X] Basketball Legends has more visits (752.8M vs 97M). Full side-by-side history for [2X] Basketball Legends and [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | [2X] Basketball Legends | [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,114 | 8,865 | 3,751 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 6,510 | 16,266 | 9,756 (2.5×) |
| 24h average | 4,854 | 11,185 | 6,331 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,840 | 16,266 | 8,426 (2.1×) |
| 7-day average | 4,741 | 7,246 | 2,505 (1.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,840 | 16,266 | 8,426 (2.1×) |
| All-time peak | 8,518 | 16,266 | 7,748 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 15.8% | ▲ 47.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 2.4% | ▲ 79.2% | — |
| Total visits | 752.8M | 97M | 655.8M (7.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 398K | 1.2M | 789.2K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.9M | 5.6M | 2.8M (2.0×) |
| Favorites | 676.1K | 3.3M | 2.6M (4.9×) |
| Rating | 86.1% | 96.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #370 | #205 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 8.7 | 219.3 | — |
| Created | Jul 31, 2023 | Apr 9, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [2X] Basketball Legends, 12 for [NEW CUBES]+1 Shrink per Step.