Blood Zone vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE currently leads with 2,772 concurrent players against 1,929. On all-time peak the record belongs to BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE at 4,225 concurrent players, versus 4,148. Momentum favours Blood Zone: +67.8% week over week versus +5.3% for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE. Lifetime, BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE has more visits (34.4M vs 28.4M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.
Blood Zone 🩸
1,929
playing now
4,148 24h peak · 28.4M visits
VS
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
2,772
playing now
3,400 24h peak · 34.4M visits
Player count history
Blood ZoneBUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
Head to head
| Metric | Blood Zone | BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,929 | 2,772 | 843 |
| 24h peak | 4,148 | 3,400 | 748 |
| 24h average | 2,797 | 2,898 | 101 |
| 7-day peak | 4,148 | 4,131 | 17 |
| 7-day average | 2,679 | 3,109 | 430 |
| 30-day peak | 4,148 | 4,131 | 17 |
| All-time peak | 4,148 | 4,225 | 77 |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.3% | ▲ 3.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 67.8% | ▲ 5.3% | — |
| Total visits | 28.4M | 34.4M | 5.9M |
| Visits (24h) | 230.5K | 229K | 1.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.5M | 1.8M | 344.5K |
| Favorites | 107.9K | 48.7K | 59.3K (2.2×) |
| Rating | 79.2% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #629 | #472 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | 15.1 | -23.3 | — |
| Created | Jul 4, 2023 | May 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Blood Zone, 10 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.