Blood Zone vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Blood Zone currently leads with 3,542 concurrent players against 2,751. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 4,148. Momentum favours Blood Zone: +72.7% week over week versus -6.5% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, Blood Zone has more visits (28.3M vs 20.8M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

Blood Zone 🩸
3,542
playing now
4,148 24h peak Β· 28.3M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower πŸ’ƒ
2,751
playing now
3,045 24h peak Β· 20.8M visits

Player count history

Blood ZoneWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric Blood Zone Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now3,5422,751791
24h peak4,1483,0451,103
24h average3,3372,473864
7-day peak4,1484,1524
7-day average2,7432,439304
30-day peak4,1484,443295
All-time peak4,1484,443295
24h changeβ–² 12.7%β–² 26.6%β€”
7d changeβ–² 72.7%β–Ό 6.5%β€”
Total visits28.3M20.8M7.6M
Visits (24h)216.9K303.5K86.6K
Visits (7d)1.4M2.7M1.3M (1.9Γ—)
Favorites107.7K1.9M1.8M (17.6Γ—)
Rating79.2%84.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#460#581of 7,127
Trending score75.64.7β€”
CreatedJul 4, 2023Apr 13, 2026β€”
GenreShooterObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Blood Zone, 10 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.

Blood Zone vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals