Blood Zone vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower
Blood Zone currently leads with 3,542 concurrent players against 2,751. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 4,148. Momentum favours Blood Zone: +72.7% week over week versus -6.5% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, Blood Zone has more visits (28.3M vs 20.8M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.
Blood Zone π©Έ
3,542
playing now
4,148 24h peak Β· 28.3M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower π
2,751
playing now
3,045 24h peak Β· 20.8M visits
Player count history
Blood ZoneWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower
Head to head
| Metric | Blood Zone | Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,542 | 2,751 | 791 |
| 24h peak | 4,148 | 3,045 | 1,103 |
| 24h average | 3,337 | 2,473 | 864 |
| 7-day peak | 4,148 | 4,152 | 4 |
| 7-day average | 2,743 | 2,439 | 304 |
| 30-day peak | 4,148 | 4,443 | 295 |
| All-time peak | 4,148 | 4,443 | 295 |
| 24h change | β² 12.7% | β² 26.6% | β |
| 7d change | β² 72.7% | βΌ 6.5% | β |
| Total visits | 28.3M | 20.8M | 7.6M |
| Visits (24h) | 216.9K | 303.5K | 86.6K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 2.7M | 1.3M (1.9Γ) |
| Favorites | 107.7K | 1.9M | 1.8M (17.6Γ) |
| Rating | 79.2% | 84.9% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #460 | #581 | of 7,127 |
| Trending score | 75.6 | 4.7 | β |
| Created | Jul 4, 2023 | Apr 13, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Shooter | Obby & Platformer | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 10 days for Blood Zone, 10 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.