Decaying Winter vs Build to Defend Loot

Build to Defend Loot currently leads with 2,540 concurrent players against 2,173. On all-time peak the record belongs to Decaying Winter at 4,146 concurrent players, versus 3,107. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +9.9% week over week versus -16.2% for Decaying Winter. Lifetime, Build to Defend Loot has more visits (112.2M vs 75.4M). Full side-by-side history for Decaying Winter and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.

Decaying Winter
2,173
playing now
3,158 24h peak · 75.4M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
2,540
playing now
2,681 24h peak · 112.2M visits

Player count history

Decaying WinterBuild to Defend Loot

Head to head

Metric Decaying Winter Build to Defend LootDifference
Playing now2,1732,540367
24h peak3,1582,681477
24h average2,2812,2756
7-day peak3,5652,978587
7-day average2,2572,122135
30-day peak3,5652,978587
All-time peak4,1463,1071,039
24h change 2.8% 11.7%
7d change 16.2% 9.9%
Total visits75.4M112.2M36.8M
Visits (24h)119.3K270.6K151.3K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)886.9K2M1.1M (2.3×)
Favorites311.1K97.3K213.8K (3.2×)
Rating91.6%87.2%
Global rank (players)#745#643of 8,019
Trending score3.523.9
CreatedMay 14, 2023Jan 3, 2026
GenreShooterSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Decaying Winter, 12 for Build to Defend Loot.