Decaying Winter vs [UPD] Neo Tennis

Decaying Winter currently leads with 2,235 concurrent players against 1,713. On all-time peak the record belongs to Decaying Winter at 4,146 concurrent players, versus 3,181. Momentum favours [UPD] Neo Tennis: +9.8% week over week versus -16.4% for Decaying Winter. Lifetime, [UPD] Neo Tennis has more visits (228.1M vs 75.4M). Full side-by-side history for Decaying Winter and [UPD] Neo Tennis is charted above.

Decaying Winter
2,235
playing now
3,158 24h peak · 75.4M visits
VS
[UPD] Neo Tennis
1,713
playing now
2,485 24h peak · 228.1M visits

Player count history

Decaying Winter[UPD] Neo Tennis

Head to head

Metric Decaying Winter [UPD] Neo TennisDifference
Playing now2,2351,713522
24h peak3,1582,485673
24h average2,2781,812466
7-day peak3,5652,978587
7-day average2,2531,665588
30-day peak3,5652,978587
All-time peak4,1463,181965
24h change 2.2% 21.2%
7d change 16.4% 9.8%
Total visits75.4M228.1M152.7M (3.0×)
Visits (24h)118.9K316.2K197.3K (2.7×)
Visits (7d)885.9K2.2M1.3M (2.4×)
Favorites311.1K4.4M4.1M (14.2×)
Rating91.6%90.5%
Global rank (players)#731#888of 8,019
Trending score3.728.4
CreatedMay 14, 2023Jul 17, 2025
GenreShooterSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Decaying Winter, 13 for [UPD] Neo Tennis.