Color or Die vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
Color or Die currently leads with 9,049 concurrent players against 7,111. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 9,112. Momentum favours Color or Die: +43.8% week over week versus -11.9% for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death. Lifetime, Color or Die has more visits (1.3B vs 325.9M). Full side-by-side history for Color or Die and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
Color or Die 🎨
9,049
playing now
9,112 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
7,111
playing now
10,142 24h peak · 325.9M visits
Player count history
Color or Die[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
Head to head
| Metric | Color or Die | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 9,049 | 7,111 | 1,938 |
| 24h peak | 9,112 | 10,142 | 1,030 |
| 24h average | 7,357 | 6,318 | 1,039 |
| 7-day peak | 9,112 | 10,142 | 1,030 |
| 7-day average | 5,883 | 6,598 | 715 |
| 30-day peak | 9,112 | 10,142 | 1,030 |
| All-time peak | 9,112 | 10,397 | 1,285 |
| 24h change | ▲ 21.5% | ▲ 7.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 43.8% | ▼ 11.9% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 325.9M | 1B (4.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 741.3K | 491.2K | 250.1K (1.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 4.6M | 3.8M | 759.1K |
| Favorites | 1.7M | 639.3K | 1.1M (2.7×) |
| Rating | 90.1% | 87.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #232 | #300 | of 7,783 |
| Trending score | 96.5 | -16.1 | — |
| Created | Mar 29, 2023 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Color or Die, 12 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.