Crossovers vs Artificial Combat

Artificial Combat currently leads with 97 concurrent players against 80. On all-time peak the record belongs to Artificial Combat at 203 concurrent players, versus 195. Lifetime, Crossovers has more visits (10.1M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Crossovers and Artificial Combat is charted above.

βš”οΈ Crossovers πŸ’£
80
playing now
195 24h peak Β· 10.1M visits
VS
Artificial Combat
97
playing now
176 24h peak Β· 1.5M visits

Player count history

CrossoversArtificial Combat

Head to head

Metric Crossovers Artificial CombatDifference
Playing now809717
24h peak19517619
24h average1091101
7-day peak1951914
7-day average10011818
30-day peak1952038
All-time peak1952038
24h changeβ–² 14.7%β–² 0.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits10.1M1.5M8.6M (6.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)11.3K9.6K1.8K
Visits (7d)22.1K36.6K14.5K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites54.9K24.6K30.3K (2.2Γ—)
Rating86.2%79.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,740#3,648of 7,707
Trending score14.9-11.6β€”
CreatedMar 20, 2023Feb 29, 2024β€”
GenreActionActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Crossovers, 5 for Artificial Combat.

Crossovers vs Artificial Combat β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals