[ ICE] Train Simulator vs Artificial Warfare

Artificial Warfare currently leads with 282 concurrent players against 185, a 1.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Artificial Warfare at 410 concurrent players, versus 352. Lifetime, [ ICE] Train Simulator has more visits (33.9M vs 17M). Full side-by-side history for [ ICE] Train Simulator and Artificial Warfare is charted above.

[πŸš… ICE] πŸš„ Train Simulator πŸš‰
185
playing now
316 24h peak Β· 33.9M visits
VS
Artificial Warfare
282
playing now
391 24h peak Β· 17M visits

Player count history

[ ICE] Train SimulatorArtificial Warfare

Head to head

Metric [ ICE] Train Simulator Artificial WarfareDifference
Playing now18528297 (1.5Γ—)
24h peak31639175
24h average17226492 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak35239139
7-day average16926192 (1.5Γ—)
30-day peak35239139
All-time peak35241058
24h changeβ–Ό 7.0%β–² 12.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits33.9M17M16.9M (2.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)31.5K25K6.5K
Visits (7d)69.6K90.2K20.6K
Favorites15.3K81.5K66.2K (5.3Γ—)
Rating68.7%86.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#3,067#2,674of 7,662
Trending score3.52.6β€”
CreatedMar 16, 2023Jan 21, 2024β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for [ ICE] Train Simulator, 5 for Artificial Warfare.

[ ICE] Train Simulator vs Artificial Warfare β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals