Fencing vs Visual Pianos

Visual Pianos currently leads with 406 concurrent players against 8, a 50.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Visual Pianos at 506 concurrent players, versus 490. Momentum favours Fencing: +2700.0% week over week versus -1.9% for Visual Pianos. Lifetime, Visual Pianos has more visits (60.9M vs 33.6M). Full side-by-side history for Fencing and Visual Pianos is charted above.

Fencing
8
playing now
490 24h peak · 33.6M visits
VS
Visual Pianos 🎹
406
playing now
478 24h peak · 60.9M visits

Player count history

FencingVisual Pianos

Head to head

Metric Fencing Visual PianosDifference
Playing now8406398 (50.8×)
24h peak49047812
24h average117402285 (3.4×)
7-day peak49047812
7-day average28360332 (12.9×)
30-day peak49047812
All-time peak49050616
24h change >999% 4.7%
7d change >999% 1.9%
Total visits33.6M60.9M27.3M (1.8×)
Visits (24h)3K43.9K40.9K (14.7×)
Visits (7d)6.8K300.5K293.7K (44.4×)
Favorites119.3K875.7K756.3K (7.3×)
Rating75.0%89.6%
Global rank (players)#5,409#2,356of 8,283
Trending score353.328.5
CreatedJun 22, 2009Aug 20, 2020
GenreActionEntertainment

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Fencing, 13 for Visual Pianos.