FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,587 concurrent players against 4,056. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander at 6,746 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.3M vs 22.3M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,587
playing now
5,832 24h peak Β· 313.3M visits
VS
[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
4,056
playing now
6,480 24h peak Β· 22.3M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal Nights[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderDifference
Playing now5,5874,0561,531
24h peak5,8326,480648
24h average4,6434,6485
7-day peak5,9836,746763
7-day average4,4024,835433
30-day peak5,9836,746763
All-time peak5,9836,746763
24h changeβ–² 47.6%β–² 2.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits313.3M22.3M291M (14.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)528.4K514.8K13.7K
Visits (7d)1.9M1.9M13.2K
Favorites837.1K84.5K752.5K (9.9Γ—)
Rating94.4%95.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#295#421of 4,381
Trending score20.0-14.1β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jun 10, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 5 for [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals