FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 7,026 concurrent players against 5,310. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 7,002. Momentum favours FNAF: Eternal Nights: -7.9% week over week versus -13.5% for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (326.1M vs 317.7M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | FNAF: Eternal Nights | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,310 | 7,026 | 1,716 |
| 24h peak | 5,550 | 10,142 | 4,592 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 4,501 | 6,767 | 2,266 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,885 | 10,142 | 3,257 |
| 7-day average | 3,973 | 6,541 | 2,568 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,885 | 10,142 | 3,257 |
| All-time peak | 7,002 | 10,397 | 3,395 |
| 24h change | ▲ 25.5% | ▲ 13.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 7.9% | ▼ 13.5% | — |
| Total visits | 317.7M | 326.1M | 8.4M |
| Visits (24h) | 507K | 500.3K | 6.7K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.8M | 3.7M | 77.5K |
| Favorites | 848.2K | 639.6K | 208.7K |
| Rating | 94.4% | 87.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #296 | #227 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 48.3 | 13.2 | — |
| Created | Oct 27, 2022 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 12 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.