FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Eat the World

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,617 concurrent players against 3,249, a 1.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.4M vs 313.2M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and Eat the World is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,617
playing now
5,777 24h peak Β· 313.2M visits
VS
Eat the World
3,249
playing now
4,747 24h peak Β· 615.4M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal NightsEat the World

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now5,6173,2492,368 (1.7Γ—)
24h peak5,7774,7471,030
24h average4,5383,721817
7-day peak5,9835,240743
7-day average4,3763,774602
30-day peak5,9835,240743
All-time peak5,9835,261722
24h changeβ–² 23.5%β–Ό 5.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits313.2M615.4M302.2M (2.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)524.9K397.3K127.6K
Visits (7d)1.8M1.3M460.8K
Favorites836.8K27.8M27M (33.2Γ—)
Rating94.4%94.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#260#498of 4,278
Trending score13.5-5.0β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Feb 22, 2024β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 4 for Eat the World.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Eat the World β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals