FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Catalog Emotes Testing

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,723 concurrent players against 3,666, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 5,281. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.2M vs 29.2M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and Catalog Emotes Testing is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,723
playing now
5,777 24h peak Β· 313.2M visits
VS
Catalog Emotes Testing ✨
3,666
playing now
4,893 24h peak Β· 29.2M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal NightsCatalog Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights Catalog Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now5,7233,6662,057 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak5,7774,893884
24h average4,5383,810728
7-day peak5,9835,247736
7-day average4,3763,559817
30-day peak5,9835,247736
All-time peak5,9835,281702
24h changeβ–² 23.5%β–² 23.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits313.2M29.2M284M (10.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)524.9K518.6K6.3K
Visits (7d)1.8M1.2M562.3K
Favorites836.8K235.3K601.5K (3.6Γ—)
Rating94.4%83.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#260#430of 4,278
Trending score13.525.1β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jun 4, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 3 for Catalog Emotes Testing.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Catalog Emotes Testing β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals