FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Eat the Largest Mukbang

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,813 concurrent players against 1,177, a 4.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 6,365 concurrent players, versus 3,332. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.8M vs 1.6M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and Eat the Largest Mukbang is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,813
playing now
6,365 24h peak Β· 313.8M visits
VS
Eat the Largest Mukbang
1,177
playing now
2,656 24h peak Β· 1.6M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal NightsEat the Largest Mukbang

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights Eat the Largest MukbangDifference
Playing now5,8131,1774,636 (4.9Γ—)
24h peak6,3652,6563,709 (2.4Γ—)
24h average5,0481,3093,739 (3.9Γ—)
7-day peak6,3653,3323,033 (1.9Γ—)
7-day average4,4142,1202,294 (2.1Γ—)
30-day peak6,3653,3323,033 (1.9Γ—)
All-time peak6,3653,3323,033 (1.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 25.8%β–Ό 3.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits313.8M1.6M312.2M (201.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)578.3K143.8K434.5K (4.0Γ—)
Visits (7d)2.4M632.2K1.8M (3.8Γ—)
Favorites838.4K76.2K762.2K (11.0Γ—)
Rating94.4%76.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#267#1,170of 4,743
Trending score52.9-118.0β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jul 16, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalAdventureβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 4 for Eat the Largest Mukbang.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Eat the Largest Mukbang β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals