[1B] Boxing Beta! vs FNAF: Eternal Nights

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,592 concurrent players against 4,798. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 5,983 concurrent players, versus 5,563. Lifetime, [1B] Boxing Beta! has more visits (1.1B vs 313.1M). Full side-by-side history for [1B] Boxing Beta! and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.

[1B] Boxing Beta! πŸ₯Š
4,798
playing now
5,563 24h peak Β· 1.1B visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,592
playing now
5,791 24h peak Β· 313.1M visits

Player count history

[1B] Boxing Beta!FNAF: Eternal Nights

Head to head

Metric [1B] Boxing Beta! FNAF: Eternal NightsDifference
Playing now4,7985,592794
24h peak5,5635,791228
24h average4,7424,528214
7-day peak5,5635,983420
7-day average4,2004,367167
30-day peak5,5635,983420
All-time peak5,5635,983420
24h changeβ–² 21.4%β–² 19.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.1B313.1M778.6M (3.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)646K510.8K135.2K
Visits (7d)2M1.7M231.6K
Favorites3.7M836.7K2.9M (4.4Γ—)
Rating80.9%94.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#315#265of 4,278
Trending score47.213.4β€”
CreatedMay 12, 2021Oct 27, 2022β€”
GenreActionSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for [1B] Boxing Beta!, 4 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.

[1B] Boxing Beta! vs FNAF: Eternal Nights β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals