[JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

[JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite currently leads with 2,042 concurrent players against 745, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite at 2,514 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite: -1.7% week over week versus -16.2% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite has more visits (718.2M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

[⚖️JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite
2,042
playing now
2,443 24h peak · 718.2M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
745
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

[JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu InfiniteFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now2,0427451,297 (2.7×)
24h peak2,4431,769674
24h average2,0391,245794 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,4431,769674
7-day average1,6611,067594 (1.6×)
30-day peak2,4431,769674
All-time peak2,5141,769745
24h change 11.4% 5.5%
7d change 1.7% 16.2%
Total visits718.2M7.4M710.8M (97.0×)
Visits (24h)177.2K199K21.7K
Visits (7d)1.1M1.1M78.1K
Favorites3.2M802.2K2.4M (4.0×)
Rating96.8%81.7%
Global rank (players)#800#1,609of 8,283
Trending score74.250.5
CreatedAug 2, 2022Apr 24, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [JUDGEMAN] Jujutsu Infinite, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.