Surf for Lucky Blocks vs [] MOUNT RNG
[] MOUNT RNG currently leads with 2,021 concurrent players against 1,373. On all-time peak the record belongs to Surf for Lucky Blocks at 2,407 concurrent players, versus 2,315. Lifetime, [] MOUNT RNG has more visits (68.6M vs 34.5M). Full side-by-side history for Surf for Lucky Blocks and [] MOUNT RNG is charted above.
Surf for Lucky Blocks
1,373
playing now
2,330 24h peak · 34.5M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
2,021
playing now
2,272 24h peak · 68.6M visits
Player count history
Surf for Lucky Blocks[] MOUNT RNG
Head to head
| Metric | Surf for Lucky Blocks | [] MOUNT RNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,373 | 2,021 | 648 |
| 24h peak | 2,330 | 2,272 | 58 |
| 24h average | 1,549 | 1,861 | 312 |
| 7-day peak | 2,330 | 2,315 | 15 |
| 7-day average | 1,648 | 1,956 | 308 |
| 30-day peak | 2,330 | 2,315 | 15 |
| All-time peak | 2,407 | 2,315 | 92 |
| 24h change | ▼ 18.5% | ▼ 8.1% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 34.5M | 68.6M | 34.1M (2.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 173.3K | 107.1K | 66.2K (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 284.4K | 396.9K | 112.5K |
| Favorites | 1.4M | 129.7K | 1.3M (10.7×) |
| Rating | 88.3% | 95.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,060 | #783 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -18.9 | -15.7 | — |
| Created | Mar 31, 2026 | Aug 25, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for Surf for Lucky Blocks, 4 for [] MOUNT RNG.