BattleShip Tabletop vs Concrete Cleaning Simulator

BattleShip Tabletop currently leads with 220 concurrent players against 123, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to BattleShip Tabletop at 350 concurrent players, versus 235. Momentum favours BattleShip Tabletop: -12.4% week over week versus -24.5% for Concrete Cleaning Simulator. Lifetime, Concrete Cleaning Simulator has more visits (8.2M vs 4.6M). Full side-by-side history for BattleShip Tabletop and Concrete Cleaning Simulator is charted above.

⚓BattleShip Tabletop
220
playing now
328 24h peak · 4.6M visits
VS
Concrete Cleaning Simulator 💦
123
playing now
177 24h peak · 8.2M visits

Player count history

BattleShip TabletopConcrete Cleaning Simulator

Head to head

Metric BattleShip Tabletop Concrete Cleaning SimulatorDifference
Playing now22012397 (1.8×)
24h peak328177151 (1.9×)
24h average18311469 (1.6×)
7-day peak328196132 (1.7×)
7-day average14911435
30-day peak32823593
All-time peak350235115
24h change 51.2% 31.0%
7d change 12.4% 24.5%
Total visits4.6M8.2M3.5M (1.8×)
Visits (24h)15.5K15.4K89
Visits (7d)107.9K124.2K16.4K
Favorites43.4K320.9K277.5K (7.4×)
Rating85.0%71.6%
Global rank (players)#2,786#3,233of 7,215
Trending score44.70.0
CreatedJun 10, 2022Apr 26, 2026
GenreStrategySimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for BattleShip Tabletop, 11 for Concrete Cleaning Simulator.

BattleShip Tabletop vs Concrete Cleaning Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals