Endangered World vs [UPD] Paddle Rapids

[UPD] Paddle Rapids currently leads with 40 concurrent players against 36. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Paddle Rapids at 155 concurrent players, versus 141. Lifetime, Endangered World has more visits (37.7M vs 508.9K). Full side-by-side history for Endangered World and [UPD] Paddle Rapids is charted above.

🐯Endangered World
36
playing now
114 24h peak · 37.7M visits
VS
[UPD] Paddle Rapids
40
playing now
141 24h peak · 508.9K visits

Player count history

Endangered World[UPD] Paddle Rapids

Head to head

Metric Endangered World [UPD] Paddle RapidsDifference
Playing now36404
24h peak11414127
24h average61529
7-day peak141141tie
7-day average75669
30-day peak141141tie
All-time peak14115514
24h change 17.6% 25.7%
7d change 11.8%
Total visits37.7M508.9K37.2M (74.0×)
Visits (24h)6K14.9K8.9K (2.5×)
Visits (7d)46.1K52.4K6.3K
Favorites164.8K35.7K129K (4.6×)
Rating91.7%89.8%
Global rank (players)#3,739#3,688of 6,396
Trending score-25.9-27.6
CreatedJun 10, 2022Jul 9, 2026
GenreAdventureAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Endangered World, 4 for [UPD] Paddle Rapids.

Endangered World vs [UPD] Paddle Rapids — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals