[UPD] Derelict vs Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 528 concurrent players against 446. On all-time peak the record belongs to Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] at 1,307 concurrent players, versus 1,245. Momentum favours [UPD] Derelict: -18.6% week over week versus -46.6% for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (26.1M vs 3.3M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
528
playing now
592 24h peak · 26.1M visits
VS
Virtual Football [🔓 OPEN TESTING]
446
playing now
539 24h peak · 3.3M visits

Player count history

[UPD] DerelictVirtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]Difference
Playing now52844682
24h peak59253953
24h average472353119
7-day peak1,245767478 (1.6×)
7-day average561377184
30-day peak1,2451,30762
All-time peak1,2451,30762
24h change 8.8% 9.0%
7d change 18.6% 46.6%
Total visits26.1M3.3M22.8M (7.9×)
Visits (24h)23.5K68.3K44.9K (2.9×)
Visits (7d)244K598.4K354.4K (2.5×)
Favorites496.4K7K489.4K (70.9×)
Rating90.2%81.3%
Global rank (players)#2,207#2,361of 8,283
Trending score-40.8-15.3
CreatedMay 29, 2022Jan 24, 2026
GenreRPGSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for [UPD] Derelict, 13 for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING].