[UPD] Derelict vs [UPD] Lowball

[UPD] Lowball currently leads with 999 concurrent players against 817. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Lowball at 1,060 concurrent players, versus 872. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (25.9M vs 1.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and [UPD] Lowball is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
817
playing now
832 24h peak Β· 25.9M visits
VS
[UPD] Lowball πŸ’°
999
playing now
999 24h peak Β· 1.8M visits

Player count history

[UPD] Derelict[UPD] Lowball

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict [UPD] LowballDifference
Playing now817999182
24h peak832999167
24h average717516201
7-day peak8521,042190
7-day average703565138
30-day peak8521,042190
All-time peak8721,060188
24h changeβ–² 5.3%β–² 0.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits25.9M1.8M24M (14.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)34.5K40.5K6K
Visits (7d)65.9K121.9K56K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites491.1K8.9K482.2K (55.2Γ—)
Rating90.2%77.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,522#1,367of 4,743
Trending score5.5-22.6β€”
CreatedMay 29, 2022Mar 3, 2026β€”
GenreRPGSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for [UPD] Derelict, 3 for [UPD] Lowball.

[UPD] Derelict vs [UPD] Lowball β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals