[UPD] Derelict vs Zooo

Zooo currently leads with 2,198 concurrent players against 642, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Zooo at 3,710 concurrent players, versus 872. Lifetime, Zooo has more visits (364.8M vs 25.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and Zooo is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
642
playing now
872 24h peak · 25.8M visits
VS
Zooo
2,198
playing now
3,473 24h peak · 364.8M visits

Player count history

[UPD] DerelictZooo

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict ZoooDifference
Playing now6422,1981,556 (3.4×)
24h peak8723,4732,601 (4.0×)
24h average6852,5141,829 (3.7×)
7-day peak8723,5582,686 (4.1×)
7-day average6662,4501,784 (3.7×)
30-day peak8723,5582,686 (4.1×)
All-time peak8723,7102,838 (4.3×)
24h change 14.4% 0.2%
7d change
Total visits25.8M364.8M339M (14.1×)
Visits (24h)35.3K453.3K418K (12.8×)
Visits (7d)47.4K1.1M1M (22.8×)
Favorites491K179.8K311.2K (2.7×)
Rating90.2%75.7%
Global rank (players)#1,500#683of 4,425
Trending score7.88.8
CreatedMay 29, 2022May 12, 2023
GenreRPGSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for [UPD] Derelict, 4 for Zooo.

[UPD] Derelict vs Zooo — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals