[UPD] Derelict vs Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby
[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 817 concurrent players against 281, a 2.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby at 1,034 concurrent players, versus 872. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (25.9M vs 19.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby is charted above.
[UPD] Derelict
817
playing now
832 24h peak · 25.9M visits
VS
Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby
281
playing now
701 24h peak · 19.8M visits
Player count history
[UPD] DerelictClash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD] Derelict | Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 817 | 281 | 536 (2.9×) |
| 24h peak | 832 | 701 | 131 |
| 24h average | 717 | 445 | 272 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 852 | 1,034 | 182 |
| 7-day average | 703 | 487 | 216 |
| 30-day peak | 852 | 1,034 | 182 |
| All-time peak | 872 | 1,034 | 162 |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.3% | ▼ 10.1% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 25.9M | 19.8M | 6M |
| Visits (24h) | 34.5K | 71.3K | 36.8K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 65.9K | 317.9K | 252K (4.8×) |
| Favorites | 491.1K | 56.6K | 434.6K (8.7×) |
| Rating | 90.2% | 88.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,522 | #2,364 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 5.5 | -21.8 | — |
| Created | May 29, 2022 | Mar 17, 2026 | — |
| Genre | RPG | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for [UPD] Derelict, 5 for Clash's Glitch Per Difficulty Chart Obby.