[UPD] Derelict vs Would you rather but it happens 2

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 834 concurrent players against 359, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 872 concurrent players, versus 404. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (25.9M vs 17.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and Would you rather but it happens 2 is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
834
playing now
834 24h peak · 25.9M visits
VS
Would you rather but it happens 2
359
playing now
404 24h peak · 17.8M visits

Player count history

[UPD] DerelictWould you rather but it happens 2

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict Would you rather but it happens 2Difference
Playing now834359475 (2.3×)
24h peak834404430 (2.1×)
24h average718308410 (2.3×)
7-day peak852404448 (2.1×)
7-day average704244460 (2.9×)
30-day peak852404448 (2.1×)
All-time peak872404468 (2.2×)
24h change 5.4% 31.1%
7d change
Total visits25.9M17.8M8M
Visits (24h)34.8K82.4K47.6K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)66.2K199K132.9K (3.0×)
Favorites491.1K26.3K464.8K (18.7×)
Rating90.2%57.7%
Global rank (players)#1,514#2,161of 4,743
Trending score5.559.5
CreatedMay 29, 2022Mar 3, 2026
GenreRPGParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for [UPD] Derelict, 3 for Would you rather but it happens 2.

[UPD] Derelict vs Would you rather but it happens 2 — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals