[UPD] Derelict vs Roll to Defend

Roll to Defend currently leads with 480 concurrent players against 422. On all-time peak the record belongs to Roll to Defend at 1,563 concurrent players, versus 1,245. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (26M vs 13.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and Roll to Defend is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
422
playing now
1,245 24h peak · 26M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
480
playing now
745 24h peak · 13.8M visits

Player count history

[UPD] DerelictRoll to Defend

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict Roll to DefendDifference
Playing now42248058
24h peak1,245745500 (1.7×)
24h average692547145
7-day peak1,2451,563318
7-day average701993292
30-day peak1,2451,563318
All-time peak1,2451,563318
24h change 12.6% 7.8%
7d change 21.9%
Total visits26M13.8M12.3M (1.9×)
Visits (24h)52K46.4K5.6K
Visits (7d)237.2K432.5K195.3K (1.8×)
Favorites495.2K29.2K466K (17.0×)
Rating90.2%95.8%
Global rank (players)#1,783#1,680of 6,498
Trending score-3.5-120.3
CreatedMay 29, 2022May 14, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for [UPD] Derelict, 9 for Roll to Defend.

[UPD] Derelict vs Roll to Defend — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals