[UPD] Derelict vs TRADE or Keep

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 656 concurrent players against 317, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 872 concurrent players, versus 841. Lifetime, [UPD] Derelict has more visits (25.8M vs 14.6M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD] Derelict and TRADE or Keep is charted above.

[UPD] Derelict
656
playing now
872 24h peak · 25.8M visits
VS
TRADE or Keep
317
playing now
841 24h peak · 14.6M visits

Player count history

[UPD] DerelictTRADE or Keep

Head to head

Metric [UPD] Derelict TRADE or KeepDifference
Playing now656317339 (2.1×)
24h peak87284131
24h average694487207
7-day peak87284131
7-day average676354322 (1.9×)
30-day peak87284131
All-time peak87284131
24h change 16.8% 44.1%
7d change
Total visits25.8M14.6M11.2M (1.8×)
Visits (24h)35.5K71.3K35.7K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)44.9K199.5K154.6K (4.4×)
Favorites491K15.9K475K (30.8×)
Rating90.2%71.5%
Global rank (players)#1,480#2,049of 4,380
Trending score7.394.6
CreatedMay 29, 2022Jun 13, 2026
GenreRPGParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for [UPD] Derelict, 5 for TRADE or Keep.

[UPD] Derelict vs TRADE or Keep — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals