Empire Clash vs [UPD] Cut a Gem
[UPD] Cut a Gem currently leads with 895 concurrent players against 569, a 1.6Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Cut a Gem at 4,114 concurrent players, versus 2,062. Momentum favours Empire Clash: +62.4% week over week versus -8.3% for [UPD] Cut a Gem. Lifetime, Empire Clash has more visits (52.9M vs 10.7M). Full side-by-side history for Empire Clash and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.
π Empire Clash
569
playing now
584 24h peak Β· 52.9M visits
VS
[π₯UPD] Cut a Gem
895
playing now
1,407 24h peak Β· 10.7M visits
Player count history
Empire Clash[UPD] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | Empire Clash | [UPD] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 569 | 895 | 326 (1.6Γ) |
| 24h peak | 584 | 1,407 | 823 (2.4Γ) |
| 24h average | 444 | 986 | 542 (2.2Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 2,047 | 3,476 | 1,429 (1.7Γ) |
| 7-day average | 648 | 1,379 | 731 (2.1Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 2,047 | 3,476 | 1,429 (1.7Γ) |
| All-time peak | 2,062 | 4,114 | 2,052 (2.0Γ) |
| 24h change | βΌ 2.0% | β² 2.8% | β |
| 7d change | β² 62.4% | βΌ 8.3% | β |
| Total visits | 52.9M | 10.7M | 42.2M (4.9Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 24.3K | 82.4K | 58.1K (3.4Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 414.6K | 917.9K | 503.3K (2.2Γ) |
| Favorites | 302.8K | 364.5K | 61.7K |
| Rating | 83.6% | 97.4% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #1,883 | #1,429 | of 7,461 |
| Trending score | -80.5 | -83.9 | β |
| Created | May 9, 2022 | May 23, 2026 | β |
| Genre | RPG | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 11 days for Empire Clash, 11 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.