FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB vs [πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru!

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 912 concurrent players against 263, a 3.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,621. Lifetime, FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB has more visits (6.5M vs 3.3M). Full side-by-side history for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB and [πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru! is charted above.

😑 FAST WAVE 😑 X99999999 ETFB
912
playing now
1,598 24h peak Β· 6.5M visits
VS
[πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru!
263
playing now
1,149 24h peak Β· 3.3M visits

Player count history

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB[πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru!

Head to head

Metric FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB [πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru!Difference
Playing now912263649 (3.5Γ—)
24h peak1,5981,149449
24h average1,015558457 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak1,7141,614100
7-day average1,184671513 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak1,7141,62193
All-time peak1,7691,621148
24h changeβ–Ό 9.1%β–Ό 47.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits6.5M3.3M3.1M (1.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)151K89.1K61.9K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)733.2K618.8K114.4K
Favorites712.9K38.3K674.6K (18.6Γ—)
Rating81.5%96.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,167#2,250of 5,937
Trending score-42.1-44.7β€”
CreatedApr 24, 2026Mar 26, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB, 7 for [πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru!.

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB vs [πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ] Steal in Peru! β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals