FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,178 concurrent players against 855. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,702. Lifetime, FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB has more visits (6.3M vs 1.6M). Full side-by-side history for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
855
playing now
1,680 24h peak · 6.3M visits
VS
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,178
playing now
1,702 24h peak · 1.6M visits
Player count history
FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 855 | 1,178 | 323 |
| 24h peak | 1,680 | 1,702 | 22 |
| 24h average | 1,110 | 1,321 | 211 |
| 7-day peak | 1,714 | 1,702 | 12 |
| 7-day average | 1,227 | 738 | 489 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,714 | 1,702 | 12 |
| All-time peak | 1,769 | 1,702 | 67 |
| 24h change | ▼ 16.8% | ▲ 26.0% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 6.3M | 1.6M | 4.7M (4.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 174K | 308.7K | 134.7K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 551.2K | 853.5K | 302.3K (1.5×) |
| Favorites | 695.4K | 9.9K | 685.4K (69.9×) |
| Rating | 81.6% | 88.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,412 | #1,208 | of 5,522 |
| Trending score | -28.5 | 238.7 | — |
| Created | Apr 24, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB, 6 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].