Weapon Fighting vs Would You Rather: Animals Tower

Weapon Fighting currently leads with 324 concurrent players against 160, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Animals Tower at 1,225 concurrent players, versus 619. Lifetime, Weapon Fighting has more visits (120.5M vs 3.6M). Full side-by-side history for Weapon Fighting and Would You Rather: Animals Tower is charted above.

Weapon Fighting
324
playing now
457 24h peak · 120.5M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Animals Tower
160
playing now
253 24h peak · 3.6M visits

Player count history

Weapon FightingWould You Rather: Animals Tower

Head to head

Metric Weapon Fighting Would You Rather: Animals TowerDifference
Playing now324160164 (2.0×)
24h peak457253204 (1.8×)
24h average351170181 (2.1×)
7-day peak57155912
7-day average372270102
30-day peak5711,170599 (2.0×)
All-time peak6191,225606 (2.0×)
24h change 8.1% 15.4%
7d change 67.5%
Total visits120.5M3.6M116.9M (33.1×)
Visits (24h)49.7K34.5K15.1K
Visits (7d)137.5K396.9K259.4K (2.9×)
Favorites7.1M449.9K6.7M (15.8×)
Rating68.0%91.9%
Global rank (players)#2,313#3,046of 7,327
Trending score-13.5-76.5
CreatedApr 25, 2022Jun 25, 2026
GenreActionObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Weapon Fighting, 11 for Would You Rather: Animals Tower.

Weapon Fighting vs Would You Rather: Animals Tower — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals