World at War vs [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG

[MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG currently leads with 3,249 concurrent players against 1,405, a 2.3Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG at 3,249 concurrent players, versus 1,574. Lifetime, [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG has more visits (24.5M vs 4.8M). Full side-by-side history for World at War and [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG is charted above.

World at War
1,405
playing now
1,574 24h peak Β· 4.8M visits
VS
[πŸ€MAJOR UPD]🎲 EMOTE RNG
3,249
playing now
3,249 24h peak Β· 24.5M visits

Player count history

World at War[MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG

Head to head

Metric World at War [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNGDifference
Playing now1,4053,2491,844 (2.3Γ—)
24h peak1,5743,2491,675 (2.1Γ—)
24h average1,3001,35454
7-day peak1,5743,2491,675 (2.1Γ—)
7-day average1,026741285
30-day peak1,5743,2491,675 (2.1Γ—)
All-time peak1,5743,2491,675 (2.1Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 25.1%β–² 137.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits4.8M24.5M19.7M (5.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)217K55.6K161.4K (3.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)602.6K215.6K387.1K (2.8Γ—)
Favorites5.3K37.2K31.9K (7.0Γ—)
Rating79.8%88.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,145#583of 4,743
Trending score81.3250.9β€”
CreatedMay 30, 2026Aug 1, 2025β€”
GenreStrategySimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for World at War, 5 for [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG.

World at War vs [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals