Slime RNG vs [UPD] Get Fat to Splash
Slime RNG currently leads with 943 concurrent players against 346, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Slime RNG at 1,352 concurrent players, versus 1,270. Momentum favours [UPD] Get Fat to Splash: -13.8% week over week versus -14.0% for Slime RNG. Lifetime, Slime RNG has more visits (533.3M vs 37.1M). Full side-by-side history for Slime RNG and [UPD] Get Fat to Splash is charted above.
Slime RNG
943
playing now
1,058 24h peak · 533.3M visits
VS
[UPD] Get Fat to Splash💦
346
playing now
1,270 24h peak · 37.1M visits
Player count history
Slime RNG[UPD] Get Fat to Splash
Head to head
| Metric | Slime RNG | [UPD] Get Fat to Splash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 943 | 346 | 597 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,058 | 1,270 | 212 |
| 24h average | 945 | 719 | 226 |
| 7-day peak | 1,274 | 1,270 | 4 |
| 7-day average | 1,036 | 451 | 585 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,352 | 1,270 | 82 |
| All-time peak | 1,352 | 1,270 | 82 |
| 24h change | ▼ 2.7% | ▲ 59.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 14.0% | ▼ 13.8% | — |
| Total visits | 533.3M | 37.1M | 496.2M (14.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 99.9K | 99.5K | 327 |
| Visits (7d) | 801.5K | 384.1K | 417.4K (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 3.5M | 1.9M | 1.6M (1.9×) |
| Rating | 97.7% | 95.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,446 | #2,508 | of 7,929 |
| Trending score | -25.6 | 161.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2026 | Feb 25, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Slime RNG, 12 for [UPD] Get Fat to Splash.