Slime RNG vs Roll to Defend
Slime RNG currently leads with 869 concurrent players against 384, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Roll to Defend at 1,563 concurrent players, versus 1,352. Momentum favours Slime RNG: -8.9% week over week versus -47.1% for Roll to Defend. Lifetime, Slime RNG has more visits (533M vs 13.8M). Full side-by-side history for Slime RNG and Roll to Defend is charted above.
Slime RNG
869
playing now
1,096 24h peak · 533M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
384
playing now
550 24h peak · 13.8M visits
Player count history
Slime RNGRoll to Defend
Head to head
| Metric | Slime RNG | Roll to Defend | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 869 | 384 | 485 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 1,096 | 550 | 546 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 958 | 437 | 521 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,352 | 1,078 | 274 |
| 7-day average | 1,100 | 639 | 461 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,352 | 1,563 | 211 |
| All-time peak | 1,352 | 1,563 | 211 |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.9% | ▼ 13.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 8.9% | ▼ 47.1% | — |
| Total visits | 533M | 13.8M | 519.2M (38.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 101.1K | 34.1K | 67K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 862.5K | 373.8K | 488.7K (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 3.5M | 29.3K | 3.5M (119.9×) |
| Rating | 97.7% | 95.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,280 | #2,009 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -37.7 | -80.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2026 | May 14, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Slime RNG, 11 for Roll to Defend.