3008 - 100 Players vs [UPD] Derelict

[UPD] Derelict currently leads with 643 concurrent players against 272, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Derelict at 872 concurrent players, versus 602. Lifetime, 3008 - 100 Players has more visits (113.1M vs 25.8M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 - 100 Players and [UPD] Derelict is charted above.

3008 - 100 Players
272
playing now
602 24h peak · 113.1M visits
VS
[UPD] Derelict
643
playing now
872 24h peak · 25.8M visits

Player count history

3008 - 100 Players[UPD] Derelict

Head to head

Metric 3008 - 100 Players [UPD] DerelictDifference
Playing now272643371 (2.4×)
24h peak602872270
24h average374660286 (1.8×)
7-day peak602872270
7-day average367657290 (1.8×)
30-day peak602872270
All-time peak602872270
24h change 6.3% 5.9%
7d change
Total visits113.1M25.8M87.3M (4.4×)
Visits (24h)38K35.2K2.9K
Visits (7d)60K39.5K20.5K (1.5×)
Favorites111.6K490.9K379.3K (4.4×)
Rating76.4%90.2%
Global rank (players)#2,189#1,633of 4,381
Trending score4.61.2
CreatedMar 31, 2022May 29, 2022
GenreSurvivalRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for 3008 - 100 Players, 3 for [UPD] Derelict.

3008 - 100 Players vs [UPD] Derelict — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals