Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] vs Soulbound

Soulbound currently leads with 506 concurrent players against 370. On all-time peak the record belongs to Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] at 1,307 concurrent players, versus 1,091. Momentum favours Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]: -48.1% week over week versus -48.3% for Soulbound. Lifetime, Soulbound has more visits (9.3M vs 3.3M). Full side-by-side history for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] and Soulbound is charted above.

Virtual Football [πŸ”“ OPEN TESTING]
370
playing now
475 24h peak Β· 3.3M visits
VS
Soulbound
506
playing now
643 24h peak Β· 9.3M visits

Player count history

Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]Soulbound

Head to head

Metric Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] SoulboundDifference
Playing now370506136
24h peak475643168
24h average334480146
7-day peak756756tie
7-day average36644983
30-day peak1,307820487 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak1,3071,091216
24h changeβ–² 0.0%β–² 6.2%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 48.1%β–Ό 48.3%β€”
Total visits3.3M9.3M6M (2.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)65.6K54.1K11.5K
Visits (7d)583.4K401K182.4K
Favorites7K522.7K515.7K (74.4Γ—)
Rating81.3%91.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,421#1,895of 8,339
Trending score-20.817.6β€”
CreatedJan 24, 2026Mar 29, 2025β€”
GenreSports & RacingActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 14 days for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING], 9 for Soulbound.