Peroxide vs Build to Defend Loot

Build to Defend Loot currently leads with 2,444 concurrent players against 2,002. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 3,107 concurrent players, versus 2,437. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +12.3% week over week versus +2.4% for Peroxide. Lifetime, Peroxide has more visits (410.1M vs 111.8M). Full side-by-side history for Peroxide and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.

Peroxide
2,002
playing now
2,412 24h peak · 410.1M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
2,444
playing now
2,581 24h peak · 111.8M visits

Player count history

PeroxideBuild to Defend Loot

Head to head

Metric Peroxide Build to Defend LootDifference
Playing now2,0022,444442
24h peak2,4122,581169
24h average1,9822,098116
7-day peak2,4122,978566
7-day average1,8352,116281
30-day peak2,4122,978566
All-time peak2,4373,107670
24h change 10.6% 11.8%
7d change 2.4% 12.3%
Total visits410.1M111.8M298.3M (3.7×)
Visits (24h)135.9K263.3K127.4K (1.9×)
Visits (7d)928K2M1.1M (2.2×)
Favorites848.5K97.1K751.4K (8.7×)
Rating90.9%87.2%
Global rank (players)#824#701of 7,662
Trending score26.1-2.8
CreatedMar 14, 2022Jan 3, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Peroxide, 11 for Build to Defend Loot.

Peroxide vs Build to Defend Loot — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals