Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs +1 Loot Evo

+1 Loot Evo currently leads with 2,097 concurrent players against 1,320, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Loot Evo at 4,120 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours +1 Loot Evo: +18.9% week over week versus +16.5% for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (97.8M vs 6.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and +1 Loot Evo is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,320
playing now
1,855 24h peak Β· 97.8M visits
VS
[πŸ’Ž] +1 Loot Evo 🐲
2,097
playing now
3,116 24h peak Β· 6.3M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]+1 Loot Evo

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] +1 Loot EvoDifference
Playing now1,3202,097777 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak1,8553,1161,261 (1.7Γ—)
24h average1,4722,230758 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak2,3784,0981,720 (1.7Γ—)
7-day average1,6341,977343
30-day peak2,3784,0981,720 (1.7Γ—)
All-time peak2,3864,1201,734 (1.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 11.9%β–² 46.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.5%β–² 18.9%β€”
Total visits97.8M6.3M91.5M (15.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)108.4K176.4K68K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)941.7K1.3M333.6K
Favorites1.8M301.7K1.5M (5.9Γ—)
Rating91.4%94.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,056#725of 7,126
Trending score-31.042.3β€”
CreatedJun 30, 2017Jun 25, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 9 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 10 for +1 Loot Evo.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs +1 Loot Evo β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals