Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] currently leads with 1,593 concurrent players against 1,106. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +13.6% week over week versus -17.0% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.1M vs 7.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,593
playing now
2,277 24h peak · 98.1M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,106
playing now
1,660 24h peak · 7.2M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now1,5931,106487
24h peak2,2771,660617
24h average1,7571,133624 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,3781,660718
7-day average1,6571,055602 (1.6×)
30-day peak2,3781,660718
All-time peak2,3861,769617
24h change 16.6% 7.1%
7d change 13.6% 17.0%
Total visits98.1M7.2M90.9M (13.6×)
Visits (24h)140K176.6K36.6K
Visits (7d)934.3K1.1M187K
Favorites1.8M783K994.5K (2.3×)
Rating91.4%81.7%
Global rank (players)#1,016#1,350of 7,978
Trending score19.322.1
CreatedJun 30, 2017Apr 24, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.