Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs [W2] +1 Speed Shinobi Escape
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] currently leads with 1,622 concurrent players against 938, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 2,156. Momentum favours [W2] +1 Speed Shinobi Escape: +13.4% week over week versus +12.3% for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 15.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and [W2] +1 Speed Shinobi Escape is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | [W2] +1 Speed Shinobi Escape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,622 | 938 | 684 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,992 | 1,471 | 521 |
| 24h average | 1,700 | 1,080 | 620 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 2,137 | 241 |
| 7-day average | 1,665 | 1,141 | 524 |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 2,137 | 241 |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 2,156 | 230 |
| 24h change | ▼ 8.2% | ▼ 1.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 12.3% | ▲ 13.4% | — |
| Total visits | 98.2M | 15.5M | 82.7M (6.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 130.4K | 137.5K | 7.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 932.8K | 1M | 77.6K |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 664.2K | 1.1M (2.7×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 95.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,016 | #1,489 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 6.7 | -15.9 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 7, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 12 for [W2] +1 Speed Shinobi Escape.