Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Backstretch Battles Racing
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] currently leads with 1,736 concurrent players against 978, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 1,903. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +19.0% week over week versus -13.0% for Backstretch Battles Racing. Lifetime, Backstretch Battles Racing has more visits (98.6M vs 97.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Backstretch Battles Racing is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | Backstretch Battles Racing | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,736 | 978 | 758 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 2,057 | 1,564 | 493 |
| 24h average | 1,624 | 947 | 677 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 1,863 | 515 |
| 7-day average | 1,660 | 1,034 | 626 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 1,863 | 515 |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 1,903 | 483 |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.0% | ▲ 0.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 19.0% | ▼ 13.0% | — |
| Total visits | 97.8M | 98.6M | 862K |
| Visits (24h) | 115.1K | 98.2K | 16.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 947.8K | 764.8K | 183K |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 347.2K | 1.4M (5.1×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 76.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #949 | #1,439 | of 7,060 |
| Trending score | -6.9 | -24.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | Jul 13, 2020 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 10 for Backstretch Battles Racing.