Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 2,782 concurrent players against 1,657, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +12.7% week over week versus -16.3% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (618.6M vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Eat the World is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,657
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,782
playing now
3,880 24h peak · 618.6M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Eat the World

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now1,6572,7821,125 (1.7×)
24h peak1,9923,8801,888 (1.9×)
24h average1,7303,2291,499 (1.9×)
7-day peak2,3784,1011,723 (1.7×)
7-day average1,6713,2441,573 (1.9×)
30-day peak2,3784,2941,916 (1.8×)
All-time peak2,3865,2612,875 (2.2×)
24h change 5.1% 1.8%
7d change 12.7% 16.3%
Total visits98.2M618.6M520.3M (6.3×)
Visits (24h)130.9K320.4K189.5K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)933.1K2.3M1.3M (2.4×)
Favorites1.8M27.9M26.1M (15.7×)
Rating91.4%94.7%
Global rank (players)#1,043#691of 8,283
Trending score11.3-1.6
CreatedJun 30, 2017Feb 22, 2024
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 13 for Eat the World.