Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs ABA

ABA currently leads with 7,394 concurrent players against 1,358, a 5.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 7,634 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +11.3% week over week versus +0.2% for ABA. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and ABA is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,358
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
ABA
7,394
playing now
7,634 24h peak · 1.3B visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]ABA

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] ABADifference
Playing now1,3587,3946,036 (5.4×)
24h peak1,9927,6345,642 (3.8×)
24h average1,6126,5984,986 (4.1×)
7-day peak2,3787,6345,256 (3.2×)
7-day average1,6505,5023,852 (3.3×)
30-day peak2,3787,6345,256 (3.2×)
All-time peak2,3867,6345,248 (3.2×)
24h change 13.3% 16.1%
7d change 11.3% 0.2%
Total visits98.2M1.3B1.2B (13.3×)
Visits (24h)132.8K514.2K381.4K (3.9×)
Visits (7d)935.3K3.4M2.5M (3.7×)
Favorites1.8M1M776.9K (1.8×)
Rating91.4%80.8%
Global rank (players)#1,074#191of 8,283
Trending score-7.375.8
CreatedJun 30, 2017Feb 25, 2018
GenreSimulationAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 13 for ABA.