Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE currently leads with 2,917 concurrent players against 1,268, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE at 4,225 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +16.1% week over week versus +5.5% for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (97.8M vs 34.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,268 | 2,917 | 1,649 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 1,855 | 3,400 | 1,545 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,425 | 2,761 | 1,336 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 4,131 | 1,753 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 1,626 | 3,099 | 1,473 (1.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 4,131 | 1,753 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 4,225 | 1,839 (1.8×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 14.1% | ▼ 0.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.1% | ▲ 5.5% | — |
| Total visits | 97.8M | 34.3M | 63.5M (2.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 110.2K | 222.6K | 112.4K (2.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 944.3K | 1.8M | 875.9K (1.9×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 48.6K | 1.7M (36.6×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,072 | #529 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -38.4 | -37.3 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | May 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 9 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.