Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs [FPS] Flick

[FPS] Flick currently leads with 2,511 concurrent players against 1,622, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FPS] Flick at 4,793 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +12.3% week over week versus -1.0% for [FPS] Flick. Lifetime, [FPS] Flick has more visits (467.9M vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and [FPS] Flick is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,622
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
[FPS] Flick
2,511
playing now
3,926 24h peak · 467.9M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS][FPS] Flick

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] [FPS] FlickDifference
Playing now1,6222,511889 (1.5×)
24h peak1,9923,9261,934 (2.0×)
24h average1,7003,0591,359 (1.8×)
7-day peak2,3784,2131,835 (1.8×)
7-day average1,6652,9511,286 (1.8×)
30-day peak2,3784,2131,835 (1.8×)
All-time peak2,3864,7932,407 (2.0×)
24h change 8.2% 4.6%
7d change 12.3% 1.0%
Total visits98.2M467.9M369.6M (4.8×)
Visits (24h)130.4K492.8K362.4K (3.8×)
Visits (7d)932.8K3.5M2.5M (3.7×)
Favorites1.8M377.6K1.4M (4.7×)
Rating91.4%92.9%
Global rank (players)#1,016#709of 8,283
Trending score6.712.7
CreatedJun 30, 2017Sep 25, 2025
GenreSimulationShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 13 for [FPS] Flick.