Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Decaying Winter

Decaying Winter currently leads with 1,351 concurrent players against 1,142. On all-time peak the record belongs to Decaying Winter at 4,146 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +10.5% week over week versus -21.3% for Decaying Winter. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.3M vs 75.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Decaying Winter is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,142
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.3M visits
VS
Decaying Winter
1,351
playing now
2,827 24h peak · 75.5M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Decaying Winter

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Decaying WinterDifference
Playing now1,1421,351209
24h peak1,9922,827835
24h average1,4681,927459
7-day peak2,3783,284906
7-day average1,6312,127496
30-day peak2,3783,4171,039
All-time peak2,3864,1461,760 (1.7×)
24h change 21.7% 17.8%
7d change 10.5% 21.3%
Total visits98.3M75.5M22.8M
Visits (24h)129K114.7K14.3K
Visits (7d)935.4K866.1K69.3K
Favorites1.8M311.3K1.5M (5.7×)
Rating91.4%91.6%
Global rank (players)#984#824of 8,338
Trending score-31.2-30.6
CreatedJun 30, 2017May 14, 2023
GenreSimulationShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 14 for Decaying Winter.