Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution
[UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution currently leads with 4,785 concurrent players against 1,734, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution at 14,285 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +12.8% week over week versus -31.0% for [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 53.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,734 | 4,785 | 3,051 (2.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,992 | 8,084 | 6,092 (4.1×) |
| 24h average | 1,748 | 4,510 | 2,762 (2.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 8,490 | 6,112 (3.6×) |
| 7-day average | 1,673 | 5,079 | 3,406 (3.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 11,538 | 9,160 (4.9×) |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 14,285 | 11,899 (6.0×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.4% | ▲ 6.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 12.8% | ▼ 31.0% | — |
| Total visits | 98.2M | 53.6M | 44.6M (1.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 132.1K | 557.8K | 425.8K (4.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 934K | 4.8M | 3.8M (5.1×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 1.2M | 554K |
| Rating | 91.4% | 98.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,046 | #410 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 14.3 | -40.8 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | May 30, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 13 for [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution.