Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,686 concurrent players against 1,195. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 2,370. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +231.9% week over week versus +15.9% for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (97.8M vs 3.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,195 | 1,686 | 491 |
| 24h peak | 1,855 | 2,243 | 388 |
| 24h average | 1,376 | 1,753 | 377 |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 2,336 | 42 |
| 7-day average | 1,618 | 1,457 | 161 |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 2,336 | 42 |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 2,370 | 16 |
| 24h change | ▼ 16.1% | ▼ 0.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 15.9% | ▲ 231.9% | — |
| Total visits | 97.8M | 3.2M | 94.7M (30.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 111.2K | 409K | 297.7K (3.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 946.6K | 2.3M | 1.4M (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 20.3K | 1.8M (87.3×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 91.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,096 | #819 | of 7,215 |
| Trending score | -46.3 | 64.8 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 10 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].