Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Dino Hunters[UPD]

Dino Hunters[UPD] currently leads with 4,228 concurrent players against 1,230, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Dino Hunters[UPD] at 7,693 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +11.2% week over week versus +2.0% for Dino Hunters[UPD]. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 21.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Dino Hunters[UPD] is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,230
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
Dino Hunters[UPD]
4,228
playing now
5,303 24h peak · 21.2M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Dino Hunters[UPD]

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Dino Hunters[UPD]Difference
Playing now1,2304,2282,998 (3.4×)
24h peak1,9925,3033,311 (2.7×)
24h average1,5584,6193,061 (3.0×)
7-day peak2,3786,7164,338 (2.8×)
7-day average1,6445,2763,632 (3.2×)
30-day peak2,3786,8144,436 (2.9×)
All-time peak2,3867,6935,307 (3.2×)
24h change 16.6% 13.7%
7d change 11.2% 2.0%
Total visits98.2M21.2M77M (4.6×)
Visits (24h)128.2K293.8K165.6K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)932.7K2.5M1.6M (2.7×)
Favorites1.8M54.3K1.7M (32.7×)
Rating91.4%92.6%
Global rank (players)#1,078#343of 8,339
Trending score-16.5-45.4
CreatedJun 30, 2017Jun 5, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 14 for Dino Hunters[UPD].